Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spring Break '83 (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep per WP:SNOW (non admin close). Dustitalk to me 19:13, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Spring Break '83 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Added header to malformed nomination. The original nomination was by User:Ninthlocal1985; their text follows. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 02:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Future film, un referenced. Ninthlocal1985 (talk) 21:52, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I see no reason to delete this. It certainly needs some work though. I have added one reference, but I believe notability is there. TINYMARK 22:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Meets WP:FILM in that principle filming started, and the stopping was covered in the news. I note, btw, that this nomination is incomplete, and this editor's only contributions are four AfDs begun today, two others of them are also on rather dubious grounds. —Quasirandom (talk) 23:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Not my cup of tea, but clearly notable. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 01:09, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment There was no header on this AfD, and it was confusing on the 3 April AfD page. I've added the header template. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 02:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, seems fine for me. Stifle (talk) 18:05, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.