Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spring Thomas (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Addhoc (talk) 15:41, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spring Thomas

Recreation of a deleted article from prior AFB. Still doesn't satisfy WP:BIO Vinh1313 (talk) 00:21, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Vinh1313 (talk) 00:27, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This page should NOT be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.254.159.50 (talk) 00:50, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think it should not be deleted. First: it is different from the others deleted versions. I made this last one. Second: she is famous, she is on urban dictionary and has more than 350.000 results on google. Third: There is reference: imdb and iafd and others. There are many porn actress pages on wikipedia, this one should stay.
Delete No sources, not notable, as person is only in 3 movies and is not well-known. Also, doesn't satisfy WP:BIO. Tim meh ^contribs 01:07, 6 January 2008 (UTC)`[reply]
Delete: Non-notable actor. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 01:43, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'd like to see if this is recreation of deleted material, but this is still not notable.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 02:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. The original article was deleted on March 27, 2006 by User:JIP after the results of the 1st AFD came back as Delete. Tabercil (talk) 02:35, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is this version the same as the deleted version? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I was wanting to know, whether it was substantially identical to the deleted version. Since you and I are both currently going through RfA, we're similar in those two respects with regard to this (as we'd be able to check the old deleted version), and also the level of consensus in our RfAs is about the same. Coincidence.-h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 04:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well the entirety of the article when it was first deleted was: "Spring Thomas is a blonde American adult movie star, often featured in interracial pornography, as she only works with black actors." So the current version is (arguably) more advanced than what it was during the first AFD discussion. Tabercil (talk) 16:12, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment According to the log, this subject has already been deleted 7 times. Someone keeps recreating it over and over. Vinh1313 (talk) 06:16, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not "someone", as I see several different IDs as the creators after each deletion. In order, there were Rommass, Pedro.Guero, Lugnuts, SylvainT, Cameron Green, JohnnyV123 and then Rommass again. Tabercil (talk) 16:12, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

delete & salt salt, salt, salt, salt (are we at seven yet?) salt, salt... Pete.Hurd (talk) 07:46, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, doesn't assert notability in any way. Possibly in need of salting, too. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:57, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, nn. -RiverHockey (talk) 17:09, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.