Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpyCatcher

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 00:00, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SpyCatcher

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very little detail and does not meet guidelines. S-J-S-F-M-W (talk) 00:03, 3 October 2009 (UTC) — S-J-S-F-M-W (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 00:15, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No coverage. Only external link provided is for the software's website. No notability here. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 00:17, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: That is not entirely true as I have found a review from CNET that does show little notability but it does not seem enough to make me withdraw this AfD. S-J-S-F-M-W (talk) 00:23, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:26, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet WP:GNG. Richard (talk) 01:47, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Spycatcher as a likely search term. Current article does not meet WP:GNG. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 22:19, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Reads like an advertisement, which annoys me beyond belief. Also very little sourcing and it screams adware spam. I say lose it. —ASPENSTI—TALK—CONTRIBUTIONS 00:47, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.