- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:35, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD, Simply non-referenced and unverifiable WP:V blue520 17:11, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- Kicking222 18:03, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:HOAX; there doesn't seem to be any relevant results on Google[1]--TBC☆O M G! 18:52, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and per WP:BALLS. RGTraynor 19:02, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete move to WP:BJAODN. The comment below is absolutely hlarious! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Srikeit (talk • contribs) 12:40, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Squedd's (species that lays the egg) have been sighted around 10 times this year already. The UK Squedd Protection agency provides a shelter and attempts to find homes for wayward and stray Squedds that have somehow managed to leave either Hyde or Regent's Park. The excavation of Squeggs is punishable with an unlimited fine and up to 15 years imprisonment and those caught selling the Squeggs can be dealt greater penalties. This is a valid entry: knowledge of Squedds and their plight must be exhibited to ensure the survival of this beautiful and most noble creature.
- Comment - Save your breath, sir. You've been caught and outed, and it's time to give up gracefully. RGTraynor 22:45, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.