Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squirrel Systems (2nd nomination)

Squirrel Systems

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Squirrel Systems
• Articles for deletion/Squirrel Systems (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Squirrel Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. Of the 12 sources, 8 are press releases. SOurces 5 and 6 are pieces written by an employee, Source 8 is dead but appears to be a piece about a non-notable award and SOurce 9 doesn't mention the subject. A search for source turned up databases, primary sources, blogs and UGS. Lavalizard101 (talk) 17:12, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Computing, and Canada. Lavalizard101 (talk) 17:12, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:13, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This is a brochure, and Wikipedia has no room for more advertisements. Sources do not confer notability anyways. MediaKyle (talk) 10:48, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Fails WP:GNG. No valid secondary sourcing to prove notability. m a MANÍ^{1990(talk | contribs)} 11:58, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the nom's analysis of the sources. Caleb Stanford (talk) 16:43, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete None of the sourcing meets GNG/WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability and I'm unable to locate any that does. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:05, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]