Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacked Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stacked Records

non notable records. Linux Long 01:10, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lack of notability. Founded in 2006 and article states sole purpose is to release records of founders. RichMac 03:10, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. MER-C 04:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, non notable. James086^{Talk | Contribs} 06:29, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. --Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 15:58, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, NN, unverifiable. - Mailer Diablo 16:53, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable. --SonicChao ^talk 22:15, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Completely non-notable 68.173.32.171 16:07, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete if even discogs.com cant find info on the label... there is no way its large enough to be notable. ALKIVAR™ ☢ 19:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks! -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.