- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:43, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Stadeon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject of the article appears to be a non-notable defunct software company. The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 23:31, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No indication of wp:notability. The only reference is summary of Yahoo acquisitions and it has 3 short paragraphs on Stadeon, mostly Yahoo comments about how this acquisition makes what Yahoo is selling better. North8000 (talk) 01:44, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. I don't see a claim of minimal importance in the article text; being acquired by Yahoo does not make that standard by itself. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Found a few reliable sources, but they were all in regards to being bought by Yahoo, and they all referred to Stadeon in a more passive way; the focus of the article was Yahoo. Sergecross73 msg me 17:42, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Tgeairn (talk) 03:08, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect (to List of acquisitions by Yahoo!). Neutralitytalk 00:17, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.