Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Standard definitions of terms relating to mass spectrometry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:39, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Standard definitions of terms relating to mass spectrometry

This page does not serve a purpose and simply a platform on which to push a POV. It says that there is a commitee that is working on a draft document and then concludes that it is a major failure. The creator has a history of attacking the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry IUPAC which is the only internationally recognized governing body of authority in this area and a history of POV pushing on pages such as Deleted:M/z misconception in which he argued against an IUPAC definition. Delete Nick Y. 23:37, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Unnecessary entry. Devotchka 23:40, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — ßott e siηi ^(talk) 00:00, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -- Kicking222 01:19, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The truth is a bit more complicated: the group presented in this article is working on new definitions and has presented a draft which, unfortunately is in contradiction to the IUPAC green book. If anything, this article backs IUPAC definitions. Therefore this article is not POV and these facts should be stated somewhere. 83.76.121.36

Delete per nom. --Starionwolf 05:30, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As a scientist I find it deeply depressing that people on WP are fighting about standards. There are places in science to argue about standards and these should be done in a very sober way. This article is not helping so I think it should be deleted. Stop arguing about what is the correct standard on WP and just report what the different sides want. --Bduke 08:24, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.