Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley Random Chess (second nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy delete -Obli (Talk)? 13:07, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Stanley Random Chess was found to be non-notable two months ago, and nothing has changed to make it notable since then. --McGeddon 10:04, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete The only sentence in this article is deliberate nonsense ("...apparently predates regular chess..."). David Sneek 10:31, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Already deleted once just two months ago, and claiming this variant is older than normal chess sounds pretty nonsensical. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:23, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete, per starblind. --soUmyaSch 11:26, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as nonsense and quite possible hoax. -- Grafikm_fr (AutoGRAF) 11:54, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as a previously deleted article that is also nonsense, original research, and/or hoax. Bucketsofg✐ 12:38, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy deleting: see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley Random Chess; conclusion was delete, and nothing has changed since then. -- Karada 12:42, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.