- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NORTH AMERICA1000 04:34, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- Stansoft (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Deleted once in December (PROD) and now recreated and dePRODed. I fail to find sources that makes it meet WP:GNG. -- Sam Sing! 11:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Superficial article, little more than an advert. There are two references but one is a trade directory and the other is little more than a link farm. Neither confers notability. The only other link is to the company's own website. Neiltonks (talk) 14:03, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: A WP:SPA article on a piece of software. Highbeam and Questia searches return nothing at all, Google search returns just the usual social and download sites. No evidence that this software has attained encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 20:31, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.