- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete - Liberatore(T) 20:02, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This game has not been announced, so the article is pure speculation. jacoplane 14:41, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:NOT a crystal ball. Alphax τεχ 14:45, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above Where (talk) 14:52, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, clearly crystal ball, but this brings up a question I have. Recently I have seen a lot of {{future game}} and {{future album}} tags on articles. It's been worrying me that these are clearly violating WP:NOT by their very existence. Does anyone have any thoughts on this? (I ask here because I figure the people reading AfD's are the most likely to care about such issues.) --Deville (Talk) 14:56, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Well if the game or album has been officially announced, and there is verifiable information, I dont see a problem with such articles. Rampant speculation like in this article is different IMO though. jacoplane 15:03, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed, if there is verifiable information, I can see the use of such a tag. Perhaps I should say more and state that most of the pages I've seen with this tag are totally crystal-balled out. Maybe I should restate my original comment and say that this tag tends to strongly encourage violations of crystal ballism. --Deville (Talk) 18:15, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- In this particular case Starcraft: Ghost is the title in development (though what's going to happen with it is up in the air at the moment). Starcraft 2, as separate from Starcraft: Ghost, is wishful thinking on the part of some fans. Kiti 00:03, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above. Chairman S. Talk 22:13, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with or redirect to StarCraft or perhaps StarCraft Secret Missions. But, to be honest, most of the information is copied from other articles, so only a little needs to be moved. Kimera757 02:32, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: As much as I want StarCraft 2, this article has not a shred of fact in it. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 23:47, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete there is no evidence that this game is being planned or in production. --Polkapunk 18:17, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.