Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Trek: Deep Space Nine DVDs (3rd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Two keeps, two merges, one delete, two comments and one reply does not a consensus make (non-admin closure). ChromaNebula (talk) 00:05, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Star Trek: Deep Space Nine DVDs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NOTDIR . ...William 22:34, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep with conditions If the article is converted/transformed into tables similar to those found at The Simpsons (season 10)#DVD release, Lost (season 1)#DVD release, Degrassi: The Next Generation (season 8)#DVD release and others, otherwise delete. If ST:DS9 had individual season articles I'd say move the tables into there and delete this page, but they don't, and I think it would be a bit much to have them all at List of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine episodes. Matthewedwards (talk · contribs) 03:10, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The previous AfD closed only a couple of days ago with no comments for or against. What's the point of renominating so soon? Dricherby (talk) 18:36, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply The previous AFD was opened and closed by the same editor and done in a matter of minutes. No debate. Would anyone seriously consider an AFD open for a grand total of 3 minutes a serious one?...William 18:54, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- So it was. Weird. Dricherby (talk) 19:30, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply The previous AFD was opened and closed by the same editor and done in a matter of minutes. No debate. Would anyone seriously consider an AFD open for a grand total of 3 minutes a serious one?...William 18:54, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep DVD release information is an important part of the coverage of TV shows. In this case there is too much information to include inline in the article, so a spin-off article seems appropriate. Needs work per Matthewedwards' comment above, but that is no reason to delete. JulesH (talk) 18:44, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- CommentThe DVDs are mentioned at DS9's article. The episodes are in a list article. What this page is doing is breaking it down. This is analogous to a editor creating a new article just to list the chapters of some best seller....William 18:54, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge a little bit to the main article. Much as I like DS9, there's no need to list the episodes and special features. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:10, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as redundant to List of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine episodes, the little info on release dates can easily be added to it. Wikipedia isn't a directory. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:36, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge: to main DS9 article pbp 17:53, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.