Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Wars sequel trilogy (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. NW (Talk) 11:59, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars sequel trilogy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

delete as I do love SW but there are no reports of this actually happening. GaGatelephone (talk) 20:37, 13 April 2010 (UTC)— GaGatelephone (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

• delete per nom Starwarsdarthvader (talk) 20:40, 13 April 2010 (UTC)— Starwarsdarthvader (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

• Speedy Keep as of previous discussion. Nominator and above responder have been listed in an SPI. Nominator and responder have been found guilty of sockpuppetry. (See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Dalejenkins/Archive). I'll request that an admin terminates this Afd. Shockmetric (talk) 20:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep per previous discussions, more than adequate sourcing, and apparent sockpuppeting going on. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 21:21, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.