Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starling Software
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:16, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Starling Software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG Kleuske (talk) 10:29, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Has been created and edited by a range of new WP:SPAs, (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KnewtonSoft), all but one reference added were to completely different companies, the one reference remaining is simply a business listing. Nothing to meet WP:GNG or WP:NCORP Melcous (talk) 11:36, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete (possible CSD A7): An article on a start-up firm, sourced only to a business listing. My searches are finding nothing better. (Note that there is also a similarly named company in Brazil [1] and others in South Africa, India, etc.) Regarding this one, it fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 12:37, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 12:41, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Blatant WP:PROMO.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 07:17, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.