Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starmax

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 02:32, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Starmax

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient coverage in the media, possible advertising Verbal.noun (talk) 21:38, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I don't really know how to find Korean sources, but there are a few English-language ones. This article says it was the first film-related company to register on KOSDAQ. This article says it's one of the biggest video distribution companies in South Korea. This article isn't much more than a trivial mention, but it does talk briefly about its holdings and who owns it. This article is much more in-depth and describes some of its history. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:05, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep one a number of mostly very dubious deletion listings--see my note on the noms talk page. DGG ( talk ) 17:48, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per having sourcable notability, even if in Korean. I would suggest the new editor who chose to nominate this perhaps gain a bit more experience and work on his reserach skills before sending topics to AFD. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 22:22, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - rather questionable deletion listing, there seems to be quite a bit of coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. I'd also agree with MichaelQSchmidt's sentiment: Verbal.noun, perhaps gain a bit more experience editing articles before dabbling in deletion discussions. All the best in editing, --ceradon (talk • contribs) 22:31, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.