Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Static In Stereo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep - Liberatore(T) 17:02, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:MUSIC doktorb | words 07:45, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Hey, thanks for the heads up. I must admit that I wrote this stub rather quickly, but here are a few examples of the band's notability:

Multiple Non-Trivial Works: A search for "static in stereo" on the official site of Chart (magazine), www.chartattack.com, comes up with 68 results (you may have to go back to about 2001 to find many articles solely about Static in Stereo, but they're there). Here's a link to the search results page:

http://www.chartattack.com/DAMN/search.cfm?EH=static+in+stereo

Also, I don't know if this fits an official category for notability or not, but in 2002 they were nominated for "Best New Group" in the Canadian Rock Music Awards. The other four bands in the category Joydrop, Sum 41, Default (band), and Staggered Crossing have Wikipedia pages, just for reference. Here's the link to a PDF (the category of interest is on page 2) http://www.cab-acr.ca/english/media/news/02/nr_crma_jan1502.pdf

If you need more verification, I can find it, but Canadian rock charts from several years back can be hard to dredge up. Hope this helps. Davemcarlson 08:40, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, notable enough, but still needs sources. Melchoir 09:00, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above. Beno1000 12:44, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 13:24, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• keep per melchoir M1ss1ontomars2k4 15:36, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I agree with Melchior. Tyrenius 20:50, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep well known as per above -- Samir (the scope) धर्म 01:24, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.