- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 05:30, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Static Latching (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A term apparenly made up by the author. Attempts to tie this concept to a concept by Robert Pirsig are specious; Pirsig makes no mention of "static latching". No searches for this term return anything having to do with economics. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 22:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: as non-notable. If the concept is as described in the book, the content may be merged into the article about the book. XXX antiuser eh? 22:05, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Correction: Lila: An Inquiry into Morals apparently does use the term "static latching" to refer to the concept of causing a dynamic concept to catch on and "stick". It is not quite the economic theory defined in this article, but it may qualify the term to be used as a redirect to the article about the book, with a brief mention there. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 22:25, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable. Hairhorn (talk) 15:22, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.