- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deleted (CSD A7) by Philippe. NAC. Cliff smith talk 17:12, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Static skyline (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:MUSIC or WP:BIO. Also doesn't have any sources per WP:NOTABILITY Beano (talk) 09:16, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete again I have tried to engage the article creator in dialogue and explain what is needed to meet WP:BAND. To no avail. I was unable to locate verifiable, reliable sources that would establish notability. AllMusic and BillBoard turned up nothing. Google news hits turned up hits that were unrelated. I found nothing on the web that was not promo and nothing that asserted meeting notability. No hint of notability in the article, and it's a bit soapboxy as well. I have warned the article creator against again blanking this discussion. Dlohcierekim 12:52, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Could not find reliable sources to establish notability.--Boffob (talk) 15:13, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete under A7 and if it is recreated, SALT it. Erik the Red 2 ~~~~ 15:14, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not speedy this time. Cannot G4 this one (yet). OK, so they adhere to the tenets of PETA, and I don't like that, but that's not why I'm saying delete. This is a band who has no notability, appears to be little more than a garage band. Even if you remove the soapbox flavoring from the article, you still have something that seems to clash with WP:MUSIC. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 15:19, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. This is the second recreation of a band who has no notability. Waterden (talk) 15:46, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Also WP:COI and possibly WP:Advert. See User talk:Beano#Re: Artical Deletion. Waterden (talk) 15:51, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.