Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Statistical phenomena
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 03:12, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Statistical phenomena (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A crufty list that is impossible to define and impossible to maintain. —G716 <T·C> 04:13, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. —Cliff smith talk 04:47, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, indiscriminate list. JIP | Talk 04:56, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'm not sure that would be impossible to define clear and explicit criteria for inclusion in a list with this title. But it hasn't been done. Hence the present sorry state of this article. Michael Hardy (talk) 06:03, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this article has no editors interested in it, and is of questionable value in any case. Pdbailey (talk) 12:48, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Del its had plenty enough time to improve and that's not happened. --Salix alba (talk) 21:13, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Undefined and vague list in a very bad state. Eklipse (talk) 10:29, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Undefined list without any clear purpose and with barely any substantive links to it. Qwfp (talk) 22:12, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.