Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Statistical special pleading

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As per my entry on the article's talk page: "[none of the] examples given illustrate any distinct logical fallacy, and are instead just examples of correlation implies causation." Also, as another editor notes, the title phrase fails the Google test. S0uj1r0 23:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Neologism (although "special pleading" may have become accepted in general). — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 21:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom and Arthur Rubin. --Fang Aili ^talk 20:31, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.