- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 03:28, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Status Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. Magazine with no assertion of notability. The article's creator has been reported by a bot at WP:UAA. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 16:26, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The only solid refs I find are to the old Curtis Status magazine, now defunct. Collect (talk) 15:38, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Delete wp:n StonerDude420 (talk) 07:46, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete New free weekly that is not well established or notable. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.