- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mkdwtalk 20:03, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Steel Assassin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unfortunately, this band falls short of WP:GNG and WP:BAND. The only coverage is the usual AllMusic and other listing websites like Amazon.com. Nothing that would be considered significant coverage in reliable sources and as such should does not meet notability guidelines. FoolMeOnce2Times (talk) 17:51, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: The top G-hits are riddled with Myspace pages, blogs, self-inclusion sites and the like. Conspicuously absent are references from reliable sources. Ravenswing 03:07, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can't find any coverage in reliable sources either - fails WP:BAND. — sparklism hey! 07:55, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Avoiding General Books publication of this article, I could find only small sources for this. Highbeam provided one, probably the best you can easily find, but it doesn't pass NBAND or GNG. "Scott McLennan. "Hair we go again ; The Narcissus Heavy Metal Wednesday Reunion revisits Kenmore's hump- day heyday." The Boston Globe (Boston, MA). The New York Times Company. 2012. Retrieved June 06, 2013 from HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-31522067.html" It provides a minor mention, but no detailed coverage. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 03:29, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.