- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. non-notable Xavexgoem (talk) 00:28, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Stepan Vdovine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Being a school trustee is not of sufficient notability to deserve an article. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 22:50, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A former school trustee of a small suburb of Vancouver doesn't come close to meeting WP:POLITICIAN; the references don't seem to lend him individual notability. Accounting4Taste:talk 23:01, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:31, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Talk about nonnotable! Unless someone comes up for sources to meet the general notability guidelines, there's no reason to keep. Nyttend (talk) 14:03, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per nom. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:28, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.