Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stepanavan Dendropark

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 21:58, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stepanavan Dendropark (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NOTE. Lack of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Cirt (talk) 20:09, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I count three different web sources. Besides, as a legitimate place, I consider it to have inherent notability akin to a town or city.--TM 20:10, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep This is quite a prominent dendropark and the article has great potential for expansion. Again, sources are abundant. -- Ευπάτωρ ^Talk!! 22:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Eupator. - Fedayee (talk) 18:07, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.