Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steph Lecor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Steph Lecor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Well swelp me, apparently having released a single means you may be notable. Myself, I do not think it is a credible claim of notability and the article's sources do not melt my stony heart either. In a nutshell, NOTABILITY. Lack of. TheLongTone (talk) 15:44, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:10, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Not notable for you or Wikipedia? In any case, please spare us from your personal response. Lecor is signed to a major record label, released a single and has credible sources attached. Savvyjack23 (talk) 18:35, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Credible claim of significance, not notability. Significance term makes A7 even more specific. TheLongTone, can you please clarify why you don't think the sources demonstrate notability? And why it's unlikely that other sources exist that demonstrate notability of this singer? Based on a quick glance, it appears there's at least somewhat significant discussion of this singer in the media that warrants a stub, and I'd expect there's more in print as well (there usually is). Appable (talk) 19:36, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:08, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A single has been released but has done nthing. Sources focus on other individuals. A wannabe with notable pals.TheLongTone (talk) 13:20, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:19, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Released music is irrelevant. There are several independent sources with significant coverage; WP:GNG is met, so the more specific notability guidelines don't matter. KSFT ^C 03:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.