Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steph Watts (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲水 13:41, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Steph Watts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An unsourced BLP that came up before in 2011, nothing added to cite sources since Joseywales1961 (talk) 13:12, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:14, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:14, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:14, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --BonkHindrance (talk) 13:42, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't know how the last AfD closed with a keep, since at the time I recall many possibly notable BLPs being deleted wholesale because they didn't have any sources. In the past years, this page was never followed up upon. His work with Mark Fuhrman seems to be his only thin thread to notability. He worked on the Scott Peterson and Caylee cases, but so did many other dedicated professionals, and he's not even cited or mentioned in either article. Relying on a single, self-published source, this amounts to original research. Online searches reveal one passing mention in Fuhrman's own book (again, OR), and references to a women with a similar name. Bearian (talk) 14:23, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.