Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephane Thibaut
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --jonny-mt 06:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Stephane Thibaut (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable individual who I am unable to verify by research, at least in a way that would justify an article. I do a lot of work on articles pertaining to Zen Buddhism, and I couldn't improve it. I couldn't find the tiniest bit of information to use. Mind meal (talk) 10:32, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 16:18, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Scientizzle 16:04, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Week Keep By what I read on him he seems notable... and [1], Barbara Kosen, [2] are some articles on him (or mentions him)... I'm accually on the fence on this one but I tend towards keep when that happens. --Pmedema (talk) 16:42, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -PetraSchelm (talk) 20:41, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Article doesn't establish notability. archanamiya · talk 21:33, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
delete nothing in WP:RS . special, random, Merkinsmum 22:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.