Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Barker Turner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 08:43, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Barker Turner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet the criteria for a stand-alone article - perhaps a redirect to his only major role (Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2) would be the best option? PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 01:19, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 01:22, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Perhaps we can find enough more-than-trivial mentions about his stage and film work through the 200+ google news results to justify inclusion under WP:ENT. And rather than consider only Blair Witch 2, it seems he had the lead role of Charlie in Seducing Charlie Barker (simply awaiting an article), which itself appears to have enough available to meet WP:NF,[1] which could lead to him being seen as meeting WP:ENT. I am not (yet) stating a keep or a delete per WP:Ghits... simply suggesting we consider possibilites for article improvement. The nom's concerns look to be addressable and we may indeed have just enough to include him here. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 08:03, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:38, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 04:01, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.