Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sterling Fractal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 05:42, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sterling Fractal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article fails WP:SOFTWARE. The software does not appear to have been the subject of multiple reviews or articles.DeleteTheRingess (talk) 16:12, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The second paragraph deals with notability, and it fails miserably. The rest of the article is fascinating, but it's not about the software per se. YechielMan 16:20, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- per Yechiel. Eddie 16:28, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per YechielMan's guidance, though perhaps the second section of the article could be saved for inclusion in an entry along the lines of "fractal software." Thoughts? --Nonstopdrivel 17:40, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It probably belongs in Fractal.TheRingess (talk) 03:28, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment I would support such an action. --Nonstopdrivel 03:17, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • Much of that section (I removed three sentences which were spammish comparison of this product with the competition) is now the talk page for this discussion. It may need further work to fit Fractal. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 16:28, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.