- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:26, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Steven Sashen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Steven Sashen does not meet the notoriety requirement to have a page on Wikipedia.68.33.153.127 (talk) 02:59, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 February 2. Snotbot t • c » 23:57, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: After incorrectly closing this, I'm fixing the nom and removing the close.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 00:36, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:43, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:09, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment -This has the stench of self-promotion all over it. Carrite (talk) 02:25, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:24, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete cannot find substantial independent reliable coverage such as would bring this within WP:GNG and WP:BIO --nonsense ferret 17:02, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The potential notability hook is status as inventor of running huaraches. There is a little coverage there, but it's pretty bloggy — a piece from Footwear News or some such might tilt the scales there. I'm not seeing enough to get over the GNG bar in a cursory glance at the internets. Carrite (talk) 23:03, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.