- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deleted by User:Jimfbleak with comment "essay, OR, no sources, pov". (Non-admin closure) "Pepper" @ 13:31, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Steven mulenga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable topic, large unwikified article, looks an original research. Fails WP:GNG. Mediran talk to me! 10:17, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This article doesn't mention Steven Mulenga at all, although it was created by someone called User:Steven Mulenga. Possibly someone mistaking Wikipedia for a place to publish research papers. In any case, Mr. Mulenga isn't notable, and this isn't even an attempt at an encyclopedia article about him, or anything else. I suspect this could be speedied, though I don't know under which criteria. DoctorKubla (talk) 10:40, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete because the article does not come close to being appropriate for WP on any grounds. My slight question is whether to temporarily userify (it was only created today) in case the author does not have his own copy. But no, if that is the case he can ask an admin to mail him a copy even after deletion. Thincat (talk) 12:53, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.