Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stonyhurst (Farm)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Cheviot, New Zealand per consensus (non-admin closure).Finalnight (talk) 15:42, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stonyhurst (Farm) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable farm in New Zealand Madcoverboy (talk) 12:28, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. -- Madcoverboy (talk) 12:28, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- Madcoverboy (talk) 12:29, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. The farm is marginally notable; it contains heritage buildings and appears to be a tourist attraction. I've added some detail and some refs. If not kept, then Merge and redirect to Cheviot, New Zealand.
• Merge/Redirect to Cheviot, New Zealand. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:55, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Week Keep I hope editors with knowledge of the region can develop it, since I found the topic intrinsically interesting, though insufficiently developed. If there were one or two more third party reference, I'd fully opt to keep the article; see proposed buildings and structures guidelines. Merge and direct to Cheviot, New Zealand is viable if this article does not develop further in its own right. Gosgood (talk) 13:15, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.