Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stop Stansted Expansion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Stansted Airport#Proposed developments. MBisanz ^talk 00:05, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Stansted Expansion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NPOV, Notability and WP:NOT Petebutt (talk) 14:08, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - there are quite a few news sources and while some of them are just local press, so maybe not significant coverage, there's at least three or four that have enough depth to demonstrate notability. --Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:48, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly merge to Stansted Airport#Proposed developments. The activities of this organization are significant to the airport, but I'm unclear whether there's any substantial material justifying a separate article. --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:11, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence of notability the one bbc reference makes not mention of the group but does mention other campaign groups. MilborneOne (talk) 20:35, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There is significant coverage on pages 116–117 of Williams Morris and the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings by Andrea Donovan (Routledge, 2007, ISBN 9780415955959), as there is on the very many other reliable sources found by the Google Books and Google News links automatically supplied by the nomination process. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:02, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 17:37, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per Arxiloxos. Not notable for a standalone article.--Charles (talk) 21:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.