- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. east.718 at 06:20, November 24, 2007
Web neologism. 46 ghits. MER-C 11:48, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and as unsourced, possibly original research. Bearian 01:20, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh 05:29, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I don't see anything wrong with this page. I tried "story catching" (with a space) and I got more hits. New York Dreams (talk)
- Weak delete This seems to be a rather thinly veiled advertisement for http://storycaching.com/, which is linked in the article, but a non-existent webpage. The article is mainly about how this website will work. Perhaps an attempt at advanced publicity? Does not seem to be the same thing as "story catching" [1] or "story caching", [2] so I doubt a typo/spelling error here. The Google results for it [3] and Google News results [4] indicate that this is a non-notable entity as of now. The only results are either forums where someone with the name "Storycaching" posted, or the website's URL. Ariel♥Gold 08:05, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.