Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strand Home Video (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A redirect can be created at editorial discretion, seeing as nobody seems to need the page history Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:30, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strand Home Video

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was previously deleted by consensus in 2009 as a a non-notable company, and then recreated six months later. Since then, notability has not improved, and it still only cites an unreliable source. Contested redirect. – bradv🍁 01:15, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Not notable enough for a redirect, but might be mentioned in passing in the Thomas and Friends article. – John M Wolfson (talk | contribs) 01:33, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Redirect to 2entertain though. --IanDBeacon (talk) 02:03, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I agree. One source, and not very reputable. NetrualEditor (talk) 02:21, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 2_Entertain#Video_Collection_International as lacking notability but having a suitable AtD. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:21, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:01, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:01, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as above as does not seem to be independently notable Atlantic306 (talk) 19:07, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete preferably or Redirect as above is more appropriate. Certainly this topic is not notable in its own right, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:06, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.