Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strange Fruit Project
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Shimeru (talk) 18:23, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strange Fruit Project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nom no evidence of notability per WP:MUSIC. There are two external links, one is broken and the other doesn't mention anything about the group. There are two references - both broken. The group claims to be "underground" - but I think "dead and buried" would be more accurate. withdrawn Rklawton (talk) 19:32, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, perilously close to an A7 and would be one if we removed unsourced peacock terms. Guy (Help!) 19:39, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence given to support notability. Truthsort (talk) 21:30, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep. Did you not notice the link to an Allmusic biography in the article? The URL is incorrect but a quick search at Allmusic would get you to this. Or the link to a substantial Allmusic review in their album's article? Did you not find these when you Googled the group's name: PopMatters, Prefix magazine, PopMatters, Dallas Observer, Waco Tribune-Herald, Oakland Tribune, Dallas Observer, San Francisco Chronicle? And there's more coverage out there. Clearly passes WP:GNG and WP:BAND.--Michig (talk) 08:26, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: It appears that this group is notable based on the new refernces presented here. I assume the confusion was that this group has gone by a lot of different names. Is this correct? For example the chronicle article seems to suggest the the fruit project name is a name of one of their songs and not the band name. I just skimmed it so perhaps I am ill informed, however it appears to be a keep via WP:GNG.MATThematical (talk) 19:03, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The Chronicle article includes "Om recently released Strange Fruit Project's "The Healing." The album has already garnered some of the strongest reviews in the label's history and lodged in the top 10 on the iTunes charts". I'm not aware that they have gone by different names. If you take a look at the article now, there are several further sources covering the group.--Michig (talk) 19:33, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 18:36, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep. Per Michig.--Epeefleche (talk) 02:14, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Michig, WP:GNG and the nom's withdrawal. Alzarian16 (talk) 13:26, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.