Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strangeways forum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  22:44, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ATTENTION! If you came to this page because a friend asked you to do so, or because you saw a message on an online forum asking you to do so, please note that this is not a vote on whether or not this article is to be deleted. It is not true that everyone who shows up to a deletion discussion gets an automatic vote just for showing up. The deletion process is designed to determine the consensus of opinion of Wikipedia editors; for this reason comments from users whose histories do not show experience with or contributions to Wikipedia are traditionally given less weight and may be discounted entirely. Additionally, some users may recommend deleting a page based wholly or partially on the fact that a large number of new or anonymous users recommend keeping. You are not barred from participating in the discussion, no matter how new you may be, and we welcome reasoned opinions and rational discussion based upon our policies and guidelines. However, ballot stuffing is pointless. There is no ballot to stuff. This is not a vote, and decisions are not made upon weight of numbers alone. Please review Wikipedia:Deletion policy for more information.

Non-notable website. Prod removed twice without significant change to content. Delete. Hynca-Hooley 20:23, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. -- His Imposingness, the Grand Moff Deskana (talk) 20:23, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, even though they've already announced the article on their forum. This will probably go as badly as the AfD for Spinnwebe. --Elkman - ^(talk) 20:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per nom. -- Vary | Talk 21:22, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I should have looked at the page history and AfD'd this rather than {{prod}}'d it for the 2nd time. My mistake. --Bugwit grunt / scribbles 21:25, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all. —Eternal Equinox | talk 21:32, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:WEB -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 21:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Alright folks. I run the forum (but didn't create the article), and can understand why it's being deleted. I don't get your in-jokes, but be assured that this article wasn't created as advertisement.....or vanity. Someone just enjoys the site and decides to put a page up about it. -- barafundle 22:08, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - vanity. Slowmover 23:01, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per well argued nomination. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 23:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as forumcruft, no evidence of meeting WP:WEB. --Kinu ^t/_c 00:19, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.