- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Majorly 16:52, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sole source is a brief mention (probably based on a press release) asying how this project is out tto beat GameFAQs. Hasn't happened yet, as far as I can tell, and the article itself is a borderline A7 speedy. Guy (Help!) 15:02, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No assertion of notability. No third-party reliable sources. Doesn't appear to meet any of the criteria set out in WP:WEB. --Charlene 15:46, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, NN, only one reference, maybe someday will meet WP:WEB, but not yet. SkierRMH 21:56, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Best of luck to the site, but currently does not assert notability and the single reference is hardly useful. Can and will change to keep if good references are found. QuagmireDog 05:04, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- StrategyWiki was the response to Jimbo's statement that video game strategy guides shouldn't appear on WikiBooks, but that is hardly qualification for notability. Delete. Axem Titanium 00:35, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.