- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 13:46, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
reads like an advert for a NN corp Adolphus79 22:27, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom Travelbird 22:33, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article has since been pared down. I do not see how it violates Wikipedia's guidelines in its current form. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mightyseo (talk • contribs)
- Delete. By "NN" the nominator meant that the company is non-notable; see Wikipedia:Notability (companies and corporations). Melchoir 01:47, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Given the contentious nature of the "NN" designation, are there any suggestions for proving relevancy? I did not find anything in the help section covering that. Certainly Strategyn survives the search engine test, with several listings available besides the ones for their own site. Should these be posted here then? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mightyseo (talk • contribs)
- well, if you had read the WP:CORP page posted by Melchoir, you would know the standards... you must think on a global scale, we can't just let anyone with any company write an article... also, your article gives very little information about the company, it reads like an advertisement... as far as how to become notable, the only recommendation I can make is to continue doing business, and continue growing... maybe one day in the future the company will be notable enough to be included, and someone will write an article that doesn't read like an advert... if you can cite sources that would prove one of the criteria on WP:CORP, then feel free to do so... it might just save the article from deletion... also, please remember to sign your talk page entries with 4 tildes (~~~~), so we know who you are... - Adolphus79 18:09, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the article does not assert any notability. BlueValour 00:31, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.