Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StreamWIDE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –MuZemike 23:24, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

StreamWIDE

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found this which is the same as [1] and they both read as press releases. SL93 (talk) 21:40, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Nom is not clear why the article is up for deletion. At the moment the article is blatant advertising, full of peacock phrases, and referencing only the StreamWIDE website. We can clean up the puffery but what would be left? The News hits seem to be just press releases. Perhaps someone knows of better sources? If not, we'd better delete.Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:55, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I didn't mention it, but I didn't think that I had to. WP:N or if this refers to the company itself, WP:CORP. It does read as an advertisement, but I didn't add a speedy tag because the article has been around for 3 years. SL93 (talk) 22:02, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, clearly fails WP:CORP and is blatant WP:SPAM. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 02:13, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.