- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant 02:27, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete - NN UtherSRG (talk) 17:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, I don't agree with the nominator's finding of non-notability. Gazpacho 19:52, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, article needs to be expanded though. IrfanAli 20:11, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Obviously, the nominator is using the common-sense real-world understanding of notability. There are tens of thousands of dull and marginal niche corporations like this who will eternally be unknown to 99 percent of the world's population. However, here in Wikipedia-land, companies like this are deemed "notable" by WP:CORP, so unfortunately, I have no choice but to vote Keep. wikipediatrix 20:27, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, Definately notable , a listed company with operations over several continents . Shyamsunder 08:43, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- Mereda 07:01, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: This page should be kept because the company is notable and one of the fastest growing indian pharma company
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.