Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/String Finger Theatre
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk 01:27, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
A none notable webcomic, found here, hosted on a site which has zero Alexa stats. Google shows no assertion of notability, apart from a tiny update on a webcomic ranking list saying that it had reached its 400th strip. How hard is it for a stick man to reach 400 strips? Longevity does not equal notability, irrespectable of what WP:COMIC might say. - Hahnchen 01:34, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Comixpedia, that's where it belongs. Ilmari Karonen 00:36, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure we should be voting to transwiki things to projects totally unrelated to Wikipedia. Snowspinner 04:53, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- While I agree that "transwiki" should only apply to sisters, User:Zoe recently got a spanking for making the same statement. - brenneman(t)(c) 13:12, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- As the person who most frequently clears out the post-afd transwiki queue, I've got to agree with Snowspinner. If you want to copy an article to another GFDL wiki, go right ahead and do it yourself, but please don't tempt people to close afd with a result like that. —Cryptic (talk) 08:56, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- With only 2 editors who are more-or-less divergent, I'm relisting this in search of proper participation. -Splashtalk 15:57, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Again, I do not respect Alexa and favor the other Webcomic inclusion guidelines. It meets Proposals B and C, therefore IMHO it's sufficiently notable. -Abe Dashiell 18:57, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. WP:COMIC's criteria are all too lenient. -- SCZenz 17:49, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless some proponent can reasonably explain why this subject matters and has truly touched people somehow. Peter S. 22:50, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, does not meet any reasonable standards of notability. -Sean Curtin 03:31, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete utterly nn. Grue 17:53, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, existing for a few years does not automatically make something notable. --Aquillion 22:33, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unencyclopedic. Christopher Parham (talk) 06:43, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.