- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:01, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Structure101 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article doesn't establish notability and hasn't changed in 2 years. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 04:22, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as there is no indication of notability. The award is not significant. Armbrust Talk Contribs 12:08, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I think winning the award might make it notable. Website provides links to a number of reviews [1], too. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 10:22, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable software by a non-notable company that received a non-notable award. The award ref is a self-published website; I cannot find it mentioned by any WP:RSS. Thundermaker (talk) 18:21, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.