- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:41, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Stuart Dyble (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Was deprodded after the addition of a YouTube link. Other than some trivial mentions and press releases, can't find enough in-depth coverage of this individual to show they pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 11:53, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable PR officer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - The article at first comes off as complete original research. So, in looking for reliable sources I found that there is a lot that mentions him and the companies that he's been with but because notability is not inherited I find that he does not pass for inclusion. - Pmedema (talk) 20:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails WP:BLP, WP:NOTABLE. This is Paul (talk) 22:28, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:11, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:11, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete' per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Icewhiz (talk • contribs) 06:23, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - can't find reliable sources.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.