- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 01:56, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is a fake article, I couldn't find his name on Google -- Snailwalker | talk 20:27, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The part that says "is already dubbed to be a huge success, stay tuned." suggests that if this person is real, he's trying to advertise. --Jonnymoblin 17:11, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Incomplete nomination listed now. - Liberatore(T) 21:09, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom I can find no evidence of notability for this person. DrunkenSmurf 00:08, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 14:12, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fairly obvious hoax. Stu ’Bout ye! 15:51, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as hoax. I got one hit at answers.com, which appears to be our hoaxer again. ---CH
- Delete Answers.com is a Wikipedia mirror and uses other reference sources as well. He seems to be neither verifiable or notable. Capitalistroadster 03:45, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unverifiable. —Quarl (talk) 2006-06-22 08:39Z
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.