- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 23:21, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Studio Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Questionable notability tag up since April, COI tag doesn't help either. Procedural nom, I have no opinion on the article. Wizardman 20:04, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - It was created by User:Chriswhite0 who is presumably the same Chris White who works for the company, and has been edited by User:StudioCenterAcct, which appears be affiliated with the company as well. Most of the sources are company press releases and the article has a promotional tone. I think this article should have been speedily deleted as spam as it needs a fundamental rewrite to be made encyclopedic. Jfire (talk) 20:15, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:CORP. Only sources are press releases. Not acceptable per WP:RS. No reliable, verifiable independent coverage of the subject. DarkAudit (talk) 21:23, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - little more than an advert as it stands. Deb (talk) 11:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:CORP. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 22:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Lacks independent reliable sources. --Stormbay (talk) 16:47, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.