Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studio thinking

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 09:46, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Studio thinking (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No indication that this is an established term rather than OR. Magnus Holmgren (talk) 16:25, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as neologism. The book does exist on Amazon, which may or may not be sufficient for the book to have an article, but the term itself does not warrant one Arakunem^Talk 20:55, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:50, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.