Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subcontrabassoon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:27, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Subcontrabassoon

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Subcontrabassoon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musical instrument. This appears to be the pet project of a single contrabassoon player, who has worked with some (two) composers to create scores for his as-yet-to-be-realized instrument. Recordings presented appear to be synthesized and not played on actual instruments. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:25, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:25, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:TOOSOON given that the instrument doesn't even appear to exist yet. Even the theoretical concept of this instrument fails WP:GNG. Hog Farm (talk) 22:28, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - the instrument doesn't exist. In addition, there are plenty of more notable bassoon variants that still might fail the notability test, including Giles Brindley's "logical bassoon" that do not have WP pages. Millstream3 (talk) 11:57, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete none of the sources given appear to help this pass the GNG, nor does anything I can find on a GSearch. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 15:30, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. We do not publish original research. Bearian (talk) 15:29, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.