- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. kurykh 07:25, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Subdownloader (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable minor software, no references, doesn't appear in any major reviews in the media, besides an Ubuntips news item. GreyCat (talk) 09:44, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- VG ☎ 17:02, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. Despite the high-number of ghits, I couldn't find any third-party substantive take on this software. There's brief review linked from the article, but it's from a blog. VG ☎ 17:09, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no substantial third-party coverage that would indicate sufficient notability. Shell babelfish 01:41, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per Shell Kinney. Stifle (talk) 08:49, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.