Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subliminal (record label)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Erick Morillo. MBisanz ^talk 02:54, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Subliminal (record label)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not contain a single reference or citation establishing notability Nightscream (talk) 06:05, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per above. Nightscream (talk) 06:06, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There's no real need for you to add a delete vote; your nomination makes it clear that you support deletion. Ducknish (talk) 22:47, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 January 16. Snotbot t • c » 06:56, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I can't find any real sources to support notability. I've also removed an uncited praise sentence from the article. Ducknish (talk) 22:47, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:31, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:31, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:31, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 02:33, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Erick Morillo, the label's founder. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:41, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.